🔗 Share this article

Ten years after the UK stumbled into a hasty referendum that polarised the country and unleashed turmoil, a advisory comes from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and electorate entered unwittingly Brexit and the identical might transpire with a referendum on a united Ireland, triggering disturbances for which nobody is equipped.

That is the message from two leading writers from either side of the Irish border who have collaborated to examine the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland exiting the UK to form a different country with the Republic of Ireland.

Governmental Establishments Unprepared

Fintan O’Toole and Sam McBride, have found that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are extremely ill-prepared for a potentially contentious and transformative public vote.

"The lesson of Brexit remains unheeded, which is that developments can come out of the blue and can build support very quickly," O’Toole said. "In my opinion that the political architecture of our archipelago remains extremely volatile."

Released Volume Aims to Encourage Dialogue

The team have studied the political, economic and cultural rationales for any governmental shift in a volume, Examining Irish Unification, released by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They hope to encourage dialogue on the matter with a series of public talks that will take them to Westminster soon.

"What concerns everybody, or ought to concern everybody, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," stated the analyst.

"We should prevent a referendum on a yes-no, ambiguous question whose results have not been spelled out because then you end up with an extraordinarily polarised community where those defeated are unable to accept defeat and the those successful lack clarity quite what it is that they have gained."

Legal Framework

Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland secretary of state is obliged to schedule a public vote on Irish unity if it seems probable that a most voters would vote in favour.

Nationalist parties and other nationalists argue that moment is imminent, and a non-profit named Ireland’s Future has built momentum, but authorities in Dublin and London and unionists downplay the likelihood, resulting in ambiguity whether or when there could be a national vote.

Insufficient Informed Dialogue

Partisan language supporting and opposing unity has masked the shortage of serious debate, stated McBride.

"Individuals are often for or against the concept but the concrete planning which might go beyond that to realise it has largely not occurred. A great deal has taken place in universities but scarcely any elected officials or activists seek to involve themselves with even the fundamentals. For instance, what sort of state would you want? Centralised? Federal?"

Volume's Strategy

In the publication, no writer advocates unity or the existing arrangement. They writes two essays that aim for impartiality in detailing the rationale for a united Ireland and the argument against, assembling financial and social figures, historical precedents and governmental frameworks.

Debates encompass flags and symbols, levies, health services, elderly benefits, sovereign debt obligations and the danger of loyalist violence. The goal is to educate and stimulate conversation.

"There is significant curiosity in the issue but there is still lacking a debate," said O’Toole. "Discussion suggests an acceptance of the concept that there might be valid points on both sides."

Dual Referendums

A public vote in Northern Ireland would simultaneously prompt one in the republic, where the electorate say they support unification but reject increased taxation or adopting a different emblem to acknowledge unionists' UK heritage.

"The Irish government must determine what the offer from pro-unification movements is beyond just declaring: 'We want a united Ireland and we welcome you'," stated O’Toole.

Likelihood of Referendum

McBride believes a national vote in his era is likely and that it could happen suddenly. "It is possible just a mad or a poor or a negligent official who says: 'Let's just do this and get it out of the way.'"

Each of the nationalists and pro-UK supporters have plausible, valid points, he stated. "One side will succeed in this matter and somebody will ultimately lose but each side has possesses valuable insights to learn from the alternative arguments."

Request for More Extensive Debate

Westminster must join the dialogue, stated O’Toole. "This is about your state. It's a British question just as much as it is an Irish matter."